blog due on 2/26

Two 12 minute video clips

Nestle pumping in Michigan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPIEaM0on70
Califonia drought and water rights/regulation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jh90Tm_TH1Y

Yes, watch them both, and yes write a separate 3-2-1 for each. Lot of work, I know...

blog due 2/19

PFAS contamination- did you know you might be drinking Teflon and Scotchguard (non-stick chemicals)? Even though most PFAS contamination comes from fire fighting foams (wait, didn't Houston have a chemical fire earlier this year that used foams to put the fires out...)

https://health.ri.gov/water/about/pfas/ and https://www.ewg.org/interactive-maps/2019_pfas_contamination/map/ (this is just a map)

Optional addition article on it:
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/danvergano/pfas-water-new-orleans-miami-philadelphia

blog due 2/12

How South Africa Avoided Disaster

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/08/cape-town-was-90-days-away-from-running-out-of-water-heres-how-it-averted-the-crisis/

3-2-1 response as always

Blog due 2/5

Fact checking a public figure with wind energy:

Read the article: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/475701-trump-rails-against-windmills-i-never-understood-wind

Then find source(s) that support or refute the statement. You can get started with this if you want: 

Fact checks

https://www.aweablog.org/fact-check-setting-record-straight-president-trumps-recent-wind-comments/

https://www.aweablog.org/migratory-birds-wind-energy-looking-reality/

So instead of a 3-2-1, give me a 5 sentence summary of your findings, supporting or refuting the public figures statements, with evidence.